The Keywords exhibition at Tate Liverpool tied in nicely
with what we’re currently doing in context, so Gary had us all bussed down to
see it. And they’re charging a pretty penny to see it too, £8 for civilians,
though we got in for £5.
And…it wasn’t worth it.
Raymond Williams’ book Keywords
is a collection of essays on the
changing meaning and usage of 130 words. The Tate has taken this concept and
twisted it to frame a collection of artwork and images from the 1980’s. Words
scrawled large on the wall –
Photograph: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images
- were represented by pictures on the
facing wall. You would assume these artworks would be logically placed opposite
their keyword; but no, the artwork is crammed shoulder to shoulder along, while
the keywords sprawl in a leisurely manner. The result is the near impossibility
of equating the one with the other.
Maybe just as well, because the
artworks don’t really fit the categories. There was a painting of an oak tree.
Where was that supposed to go? I’d have had to put it under folk. But no, folk
means, apparently, the troubles in Northern Ireland. Whereas to most people
folk means nasal singing and morris dancing.
Another room held more stuff scattered
across large black carpets, which we weren’t allowed to stand on. Again,
keywords were scrawled on the walls, but I had no idea what they pertained to.
The Tate management had decided to use
the Keyword concept as an excuse to haul out a bunch of artworks they already
owned and charge us loads of money to see them
Yet if we hadn’t been working on this
topic, been familiar with the book and its concept, I might have been fooled
into thinking the exhibition made sense, and that I was too uneducated to get
it. As it was, I just saw it as nonsense.
No comments:
Post a Comment